I was watching a program on TV just the other day, and it was all about a fascinating little berry. It’s called miracle fruit (
or Synsepalum dulcificum, if you want to get all “genus” and “species” about it) and it might just be the future of food as we know it.
By eating just one of these little berries, it makes everything that’s sour or acidic taste sweet for the next 60 minutes or so. You can bite right into a lemon, drink vinegar straight up, even Tabasco sauce, and it will be sweet like candy. Now, scientists are trying to figure out ways to get the main taste-altering component of the berry (miraculin) into certain foods to make them taste better. The hope is that the fruit can be harnessed to make unappetizing, healthy foods taste sweet and delicious. So instead of munching on junk food to satisfy a hunger pang, you can reach for something a lot healthier.
Journalism is in desperate need of it’s own “miracle fruit”. Unfortunately, Michael Rosenblum wants to keep feeding people potato chips.
There’s no doubt that Rosenblum brought up some great points about the business of journalism and the fact that profits shouldn’t be looked at as evil. Because journalism IS a business and your news organization, however noble, WILL die if you don’t treat it like one. But that doesn’t mean that you should sacrifice the foundations of good, honest, objective journalism in the name of capitalism.
In Rosenblum’s philosophy, the journalist is a slave to the bottom line. So if it gets ratings, do it, otherwise, scrap it. Who wants to hear about “news” anyway? You know what people really want? Zombies!!
Don’t get me wrong, the
zombie thing was funny and entertaining. But it’s not news.
IT IS NOT NEWS!
Rosenblum is more documentarian than journalist, which is fine. Just don’t try to pass it off as news. Because if you do, we’re all in trouble. Big trouble.
Real journalism is the veggies: it’s not always the most appetizing, but it’s good for you. Rosenblum claims to be pioneering the future of journalism, when what he’s really doing is trying to pass off candy as vegetables just because people like it better. What journalism really needs is someone who knows how to get that miracle fruit, someone who knows how to make the veggies TASTE like candy. That’s real innovation.
Michael Rosenblum is clearly a brilliant businessman and in many respects a visionary. He’s also not afraid to tell you that profits are a good thing, and that’s definitely refreshing to hear. But the truth is, what Rosenblum does is not journalism. It’s entertaining, cutting edge, cost effective, and very impressive. It’s just not journalism. And hopefully, it’s not the direction the industry goes in.
The miracle fruit is out there, someone just needs to find it. But to settle for less isn’t journalism, it’s lazy.







Interesting. So who decides what is ‘news’? You? Based on what? You want to ‘feed the public’ the ‘vegetables’ that YOU think are good for them, whether they want them or not. Because YOU are sure this is what is good for them. Interesting idea. Sort of a Czarist view of journalism. Very Platonic – the ‘philosopher journalist’ will, through his brilliance and sheer superiority deign to inform the poor ignorant masses of what it is they must know to be better citizens. What they want? Shit, that’s just candy.
Wow.
And what if no one wants to read or watch your ‘very important NEWS’. Are you going to put a gun to their heads and say ‘you must read this’.
I don’t think your approach works very well. And who elected you the Great Decider?
This is a business. You are in a marketplace of ideas. If no one wants to buy your ideas, you are dead.
It doesn’t work the other way around.
Wise up.
By: Rosenblum on November 7, 2009
at 7:54 am
I don’t decide the news. Neither do you. Because the news is already out there and we all know what it is. That’s not the hard part. The hard part is finding effective ways to deliver the news to the public.
Your arguments about the marketplace and profits are all completely valid, I’m certainly not trying to argue against them. What I’m doing is trying to figure out how to save journalism. What you’re doing is trying to figure out how to profit from it’s downfall.
To coin a phrase, Mr. Rosenblum, “Wise up.”
By: famulari247 on November 7, 2009
at 12:04 pm
I love it. Hold your ground, Anthony!
“Because the news is already out there and we all know what it is.”
Great argument — kind of like the emperor’s new clothes.
I’ll be calling on you in class on Friday to make your points.
By: Barbara Selvin on November 11, 2009
at 10:01 pm
[...] if good journalism is like vegetables, instead of self-righteously playing “mom” and forcing them down consumers’ [...]
By: Rupert Murdoch « because they made me make a blog on December 21, 2009
at 11:51 pm